Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Is rubyfmt compatible with standardrb on rules? #428

Closed
zhengpd opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Is rubyfmt compatible with standardrb on rules? #428

zhengpd opened this issue May 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@zhengpd
Copy link

zhengpd commented May 17, 2023

I'm considering using rubyfmt for formatting and standardrb for LSP diagnostics, but I'm uncertain if rubyfmt and standardrb agree on the same rules (e.g. indentation or spaces inside brackets). Does rubyfmt implement the same rules as standardrb?

@zhengpd
Copy link
Author

zhengpd commented May 18, 2023

According to @searls comments at standard #482 and #159:

The long-term goal of Standard & rubyfmt has always been eventual agreement in formatting rules.

I guess rubyfmt & standard are compatible.

@zhengpd zhengpd closed this as completed May 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant