Skip to content

Fix typo in method name #253

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2025
Merged

Fix typo in method name #253

merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2025

Conversation

krzyzak
Copy link
Contributor

@krzyzak krzyzak commented May 5, 2025

Hey,

While I was reading the code, I noticed one small typo (sceheme -> scheme ) - this PR addresses this issue.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 5, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.09%. Comparing base (edc8406) to head (98b0ea3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #253   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.09%   97.09%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines         620      620           
  Branches      140      140           
=======================================
  Hits          602      602           
  Misses         18       18           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@exoego exoego added the chore label May 5, 2025
@exoego exoego merged commit 68659cd into exoego:master May 5, 2025
14 checks passed
@exoego
Copy link
Owner

exoego commented May 5, 2025

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants