two-bucket: Make exercise schema-compliant #713
Conversation
These are not the most creative descriptions, but they are needed for compliant with the new JSON schema.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
my sympathies about those descriptions.
I don't have much help here. If it helps, here are the states on each path:
3/3, 0/5, goal 1
move 1: 3/3, 0/5
move 2: 0/3, 3/5
move 3: 3/3, 3/5
move 4: 1/3, 5/5
5/5, 0/3, goal 1
move 1: 5/5, 0/3
move 2: 2/5, 3/3
move 3: 2/5, 0/3
move 4: 0/5, 2/3
move 5: 5/5, 2/3
move 6: 4/5, 3/3
move 7: 4/5, 0/3
move 8: 1/5, 3/3
7/7, 0/11, goal 2
move 1: 7/7, 0/11
move 2: 0/7, 7/11
move 3: 7/7, 7/11
move 4: 3/7, 11/11
move 5: 3/7, 0/11
move 6: 0/7, 3/11
move 7: 7/7, 3/11
move 8: 0/7, 10/11
move 9: 7/7, 10/11
move 10: 6/7, 11/11
move 11: 6/7, 0/11
move 12: 0/7, 6/11
move 13: 7/7, 6/11
move 14: 2/7, 11/11
11/11, 0/7, goal 2
move 1: 11/11, 0/7
move 2: 4/11, 7/7
move 3: 4/11, 0/7
move 4: 0/11, 4/7
move 5: 11/11, 4/7
move 6: 8/11, 7/7
move 7: 8/11, 0/7
move 8: 1/11, 7/7
move 9: 1/11, 0/7
move 10: 0/11, 1/7
move 11: 11/11, 1/7
move 12: 5/11, 7/7
move 13: 5/11, 0/7
move 14: 0/11, 5/7
move 15: 11/11, 5/7
move 16: 9/11, 7/7
move 17: 9/11, 0/7
move 18: 2/11, 7/7
|
Remarks: 3/3, 0/5, goal 1: Only requires the "fill first" and "first -> second" actions. |
|
And this just made me realize: Unless the goal amount is exactly one bucket's capacity, by necessity the other bucket will be full when the goal is reached. |
|
Sorry, @petertseng . I saw the approved and almost immediately merged. Shall I revert? |
No real reason to. The only thing that will come out of my comments is maybe it will help you find a better description (but it didn't help me). If it helps you, just update the descriptions. |
| } | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| "exercise": "two-buckets", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the singular two-bucket perhaps? rather than the plural two-buckets
unless it doesn't need to match the exercise slug
maybe that should be checked, I certainly don't have anything that checks it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I screwed it! It should be two-bucket.
Thanks for catching that (my third big mistake in 24 hour). 😁
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should I also bump the version number to 1.0.1?
All Your Base: Update test case ordering
Related to #625.