You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I created a rule to block a host, e.g. .*doubleclick\.net
The host is blocked as expected, but now I am completely unable to resolve the host, since DNS resolution -referring this host - is blocked too.
This behaviour contradicts any known firewall behaviour, for example known from iptables for many decades.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If you created a rule to block that domain name, the rule will be applied to any port.
If you want to allow DNS resolution, you'll have to create a rule to block connections to that domain + allowed destination ports ( for example: [x] To this port: ^(80|443)$)
Bear in mind that nor iptables and nor nftables block connections by process or md5 for example, so behaviour may differ from those or any other apps.
I created a rule to block a host, e.g.
.*doubleclick\.net
The host is blocked as expected, but now I am completely unable to resolve the host, since DNS resolution -referring this host - is blocked too.
This behaviour contradicts any known firewall behaviour, for example known from iptables for many decades.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: