chore: upgrade go 1.25

[andig]

Depends on golangci/golangci-lint#5872

[sourcery-ai]

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

• The for range num loops (where num is an int) won’t compile—replace with a classic for i := 0; i < num; i++ or range over a slice.
• When calling wg.Go inside loops, make sure to capture loop variables (e.g. i, lp) in the closure or pass them as parameters so each goroutine sees the correct value.

Prompt for AI Agents

Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- The `for range num` loops (where num is an int) won’t compile—replace with a classic `for i := 0; i < num; i++` or range over a slice.
- When calling `wg.Go` inside loops, make sure to capture loop variables (e.g. `i`, `lp`) in the closure or pass them as parameters so each goroutine sees the correct value.

## Individual Comments

### Comment 1
<location> `cmd/detect/work.go:17` </location>
<code_context>
+func workers(log *util.Logger, num int, ips <-chan string, hits chan<- []tasks.Result) *sync.WaitGroup {
 	var wg sync.WaitGroup
+
 	for range num {
-		wg.Add(1)
-		go func() {
</code_context>

<issue_to_address>
Using 'for range num' is incorrect for iterating an integer count.

Replace 'for range num' with 'for i := 0; i < num; i++ {' to ensure the loop runs 'num' times and spawns the intended number of workers.
</issue_to_address>

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.}