Skip to content

[soltest] Extract ecrecover tests #6184

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 13, 2019
Merged

Conversation

erak
Copy link
Collaborator

@erak erak commented Mar 5, 2019

After we get the alignment of hex number literals right with #6183, we can finally start to extract some actual tests.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 5, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #6184 into develop will decrease coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #6184      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    87.96%   87.95%   -0.01%     
===========================================
  Files          381      381              
  Lines        36779    36749      -30     
  Branches      4336     4336              
===========================================
- Hits         32353    32323      -30     
  Misses        2952     2952              
  Partials      1474     1474
Flag Coverage Δ
#all 87.95% <ø> (-0.01%) ⬇️
#syntax 26.77% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

@erak erak force-pushed the soltest-alignment branch 2 times, most recently from ba68ca7 to a40fbf0 Compare March 6, 2019 17:24
@erak erak force-pushed the soltest-extract-ecrecover branch from ae575f8 to 39c45ac Compare March 13, 2019 09:54
@erak erak changed the base branch from soltest-alignment to develop March 13, 2019 09:54
@erak erak self-assigned this Mar 13, 2019
@chriseth chriseth merged commit d977815 into develop Mar 13, 2019
@axic axic deleted the soltest-extract-ecrecover branch March 22, 2019 11:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants