Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

all: implement EIP-7002 & EIP-7251 #30571

Merged
merged 16 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024

Conversation

fjl
Copy link
Contributor

@fjl fjl commented Oct 10, 2024

This is a redo of #29052 based on newer specs. Here we implement EIPs scheduled for the Prague fork:

  • EIP-7002: Execution layer triggerable withdrawals
  • EIP-7251: Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE

Co-authored-by: @lightclient

@fjl fjl requested a review from s1na as a code owner October 11, 2024 11:30
Copy link
Member

@lightclient lightclient left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree

Copy link
Contributor

@holiman holiman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@fjl fjl merged commit 3a5313f into ethereum:master Oct 11, 2024
3 checks passed
holiman pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
This is a redo of #29052 based on newer specs. Here we implement EIPs
scheduled for the Prague fork:

- EIP-7002: Execution layer triggerable withdrawals
- EIP-7251: Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE

Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
zfy0701 pushed a commit to sentioxyz/go-ethereum that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
This is a redo of ethereum#29052 based on newer specs. Here we implement EIPs
scheduled for the Prague fork:

- EIP-7002: Execution layer triggerable withdrawals
- EIP-7251: Increase the MAX_EFFECTIVE_BALANCE

Co-authored-by: lightclient <lightclient@protonmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants