-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.8k
rlp, trie: faster trie node encoding #24126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
25 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
e228b5f
trie: implement & apply fastNodeEncoder
qianbin 8dc0bc2
trie: remove unused 'tmp' buffer in committer
fjl 433515d
rlp: add AppendToBytes
fjl 59ae72b
trie: add encode() method to node
fjl 470249b
trie: don't print to stdout in tests
fjl ef32db6
trie: use new encoder in hasher
fjl 76c7467
trie: use new encoder in StackTrie
fjl 2060ce3
rlp: apply buffer-reusing optimization for *EncoderBuffer, too
fjl 994a67a
trie: move emptyNode case
fjl a622a8e
trie: add comment in StackTrie.hash
fjl 8a478b9
trie: implement EncodeRLP using encode
fjl a08eb13
trie: avoid node encoding allocs in StackTrie
fjl 0077809
trie: avoid node encoding allocs in hasher
fjl a905cc8
trie: use hasher instead of stackTrieHashContext
fjl 727dab9
trie: improve comment
fjl f5e3901
trie: use hexToCompactInPlace for StackTrie shortnode
fjl faee3b0
trie: remove sliceBuffer
fjl 781ca96
trie: avoid *EncoderBuffer
fjl 9ff55d1
trie: add copyright header
fjl d083f5d
trie: comment update
fjl 7ccf22e
rlp: comment update
fjl ea6d398
trie: comment update
fjl d8192d4
trie: comment update
fjl 930fc95
trie: restore accidentally removed comment in proof.go
fjl 32b7f37
trie: comment update
fjl File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like
shortNodeToHash
andfullNodeToHash
are identical now, so can maybe be merged into one?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's a bit more efficient not to merge them because
encode
can be called directly instead of through the interface. But I agree that it's silly.