JSON RPC Error codes standardization: open-rpc extension specs [A Sample implementation] #650
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Goal
A standard for JSON-RPC error codes and messages across EVM-compatible chains and execution clients to improve interoperability, facilitate consistent error handling, and provide a better developer experience.
Motivation
Different Ethereum clients and EVM-compatible chains often use overlapping error codes or generic messages in their JSON-RPC API responses. This inconsistency confuses end users and developers, complicates cross-client tooling, and hampers interoperability.
Solution Abstract
This is made possible by extending the Open-RPC spec to support Extension specs, particularly by utilizing the x-error-group extension spec
This solution aims to address the inconsistent error codes by categorising common error scenarios
Each category could have a reserved range (200 in this case) error codes allotted between (-31999 to -30000), excluding the ranges specified in the JSON-RPC 2.0 specification.
Example: Below is an example categorisation to imagine how the standardization could look like & can be amended as per feedback with different stakeholders
Expected Error codes response validation implementation can be found here