Call for Input: Fix Comment in ERC-3448

[SamWilsn]

Call for Input

Decision	Do we merge ethereum/ERCs#429?
If Affirmed	Comment in reference implementation is changed.
If Rejected	ERC-3448 is unchanged.
Method	Rough Consensus
Deadline	July 28, 2024

Checklist

I, the opener of this Call for Input, have completed the following:

• Filled in a descriptive title.
• Filled in the "Decision" field.
• Filled in the "If Affirmed" field.
• Filled in the "If Rejected" field.
• Filled in the "Method" field.
• Filled in the "Deadline" field to be thirty days from creation.
• Added any relevant background information (or removed the section.)
• Published a notice in writing to the usual channels frequented by EIP Editors (likely Discord.)
• Commented on this Call for Input, clearly stating my opinion (or abstention.)

[SamWilsn]

I'm in favour of merging, after a quick bytecode scan.

[abcoathup]

Given it is correcting a comment, if the ERC author approves then I'm ok with this, even though I am generally against changing final ERCs. The discussions topic on Eth Magicians should be changed to a wiki post and have a corrections section.

[g11tech]

ok with the change

[lightclient]

seems okay