Static allocates WifiClientSecureBearSSL #9261
gnalbandian
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi everyone.
Having BearSSL free of dynamic memory allocations, wouldn't be sensible to also have a wrapper around it (such as WifiClientSecureBearSSL) that doesn't do dynamic allocations?
I understand the drawback of this setup, but sometimes, where memory budget is limited it would be pretty handy.
Let me know if that would be feasible and how hard it would be.
@earlephilhower I would certainly appreciate your comments regarding this topic
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions