Skip to content

Commit 7e61e90

Browse files
Pixel998Pixel998
authored
test: remove deprecated type property (#266)
1 parent 7663788 commit 7e61e90

File tree

7 files changed

+5
-78
lines changed

7 files changed

+5
-78
lines changed

‎packages/compat/tests/rules/consistent-this.js‎

Lines changed: 0 additions & 12 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
6666
{
6767
messageId: "unexpectedAlias",
6868
data: { name: "context" },
69-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
7069
},
7170
],
7271
},
@@ -77,7 +76,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
7776
{
7877
messageId: "unexpectedAlias",
7978
data: { name: "that" },
80-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
8179
},
8280
],
8381
},
@@ -88,7 +86,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
8886
{
8987
messageId: "unexpectedAlias",
9088
data: { name: "self" },
91-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
9289
},
9390
],
9491
},
@@ -99,7 +96,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
9996
{
10097
messageId: "aliasNotAssignedToThis",
10198
data: { name: "self" },
102-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
10399
},
104100
],
105101
},
@@ -110,7 +106,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
110106
{
111107
messageId: "aliasNotAssignedToThis",
112108
data: { name: "self" },
113-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
114109
},
115110
],
116111
},
@@ -121,12 +116,10 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
121116
{
122117
messageId: "aliasNotAssignedToThis",
123118
data: { name: "self" },
124-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
125119
},
126120
{
127121
messageId: "aliasNotAssignedToThis",
128122
data: { name: "self" },
129-
type: "AssignmentExpression",
130123
},
131124
],
132125
},
@@ -137,7 +130,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
137130
{
138131
messageId: "unexpectedAlias",
139132
data: { name: "context" },
140-
type: "AssignmentExpression",
141133
},
142134
],
143135
},
@@ -148,7 +140,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
148140
{
149141
messageId: "unexpectedAlias",
150142
data: { name: "that" },
151-
type: "AssignmentExpression",
152143
},
153144
],
154145
},
@@ -159,7 +150,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
159150
{
160151
messageId: "unexpectedAlias",
161152
data: { name: "self" },
162-
type: "AssignmentExpression",
163153
},
164154
],
165155
},
@@ -170,7 +160,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
170160
{
171161
messageId: "aliasNotAssignedToThis",
172162
data: { name: "self" },
173-
type: "AssignmentExpression",
174163
},
175164
],
176165
},
@@ -181,7 +170,6 @@ ruleTester.run("consistent-this", fixedUpRule, {
181170
{
182171
messageId: "aliasNotAssignedToThis",
183172
data: { name: "self" },
184-
type: "VariableDeclarator",
185173
},
186174
],
187175
},

‎packages/compat/tests/rules/global-require.js‎

Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ const valid = [
4848
},
4949
];
5050

51-
const error = { messageId: "unexpected", type: "CallExpression" };
51+
const error = { messageId: "unexpected" };
5252

5353
const invalid = [
5454
// block statements

‎packages/compat/tests/rules/handle-callback-err.js‎

Lines changed: 0 additions & 2 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -19,11 +19,9 @@ const ruleTester = new RuleTester();
1919

2020
const expectedFunctionDeclarationError = {
2121
messageId: "expected",
22-
type: "FunctionDeclaration",
2322
};
2423
const expectedFunctionExpressionError = {
2524
messageId: "expected",
26-
type: "FunctionExpression",
2725
};
2826
const fixedUpRule = fixupRule(rule);
2927

‎packages/compat/tests/rules/no-lone-blocks.js‎

Lines changed: 0 additions & 30 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
119119
errors: [
120120
{
121121
messageId: "redundantBlock",
122-
type: "BlockStatement",
123122
},
124123
],
125124
},
@@ -128,7 +127,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
128127
errors: [
129128
{
130129
messageId: "redundantBlock",
131-
type: "BlockStatement",
132130
},
133131
],
134132
},
@@ -137,7 +135,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
137135
errors: [
138136
{
139137
messageId: "redundantBlock",
140-
type: "BlockStatement",
141138
},
142139
],
143140
},
@@ -146,7 +143,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
146143
errors: [
147144
{
148145
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
149-
type: "BlockStatement",
150146
},
151147
],
152148
},
@@ -155,12 +151,10 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
155151
errors: [
156152
{
157153
messageId: "redundantBlock",
158-
type: "BlockStatement",
159154
line: 1,
160155
},
161156
{
162157
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
163-
type: "BlockStatement",
164158
line: 2,
165159
},
166160
],
@@ -170,7 +164,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
170164
errors: [
171165
{
172166
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
173-
type: "BlockStatement",
174167
},
175168
],
176169
},
@@ -179,7 +172,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
179172
errors: [
180173
{
181174
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
182-
type: "BlockStatement",
183175
},
184176
],
185177
},
@@ -191,7 +183,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
191183
errors: [
192184
{
193185
messageId: "redundantBlock",
194-
type: "BlockStatement",
195186
},
196187
],
197188
},
@@ -201,7 +192,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
201192
errors: [
202193
{
203194
messageId: "redundantBlock",
204-
type: "BlockStatement",
205195
},
206196
],
207197
},
@@ -212,7 +202,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
212202
errors: [
213203
{
214204
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
215-
type: "BlockStatement",
216205
line: 2,
217206
},
218207
],
@@ -223,7 +212,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
223212
errors: [
224213
{
225214
messageId: "redundantBlock",
226-
type: "BlockStatement",
227215
line: 1,
228216
},
229217
],
@@ -234,17 +222,14 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
234222
errors: [
235223
{
236224
messageId: "redundantBlock",
237-
type: "BlockStatement",
238225
line: 1,
239226
},
240227
{
241228
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
242-
type: "BlockStatement",
243229
line: 2,
244230
},
245231
{
246232
messageId: "redundantBlock",
247-
type: "BlockStatement",
248233
line: 4,
249234
},
250235
],
@@ -262,7 +247,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
262247
errors: [
263248
{
264249
messageId: "redundantBlock",
265-
type: "BlockStatement",
266250
line: 5,
267251
},
268252
],
@@ -280,7 +264,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
280264
errors: [
281265
{
282266
messageId: "redundantBlock",
283-
type: "BlockStatement",
284267
line: 4,
285268
},
286269
],
@@ -297,7 +280,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
297280
errors: [
298281
{
299282
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
300-
type: "BlockStatement",
301283
line: 3,
302284
},
303285
],
@@ -313,7 +295,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
313295
errors: [
314296
{
315297
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
316-
type: "BlockStatement",
317298
line: 3,
318299
},
319300
],
@@ -334,7 +315,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
334315
errors: [
335316
{
336317
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
337-
type: "BlockStatement",
338318
line: 5,
339319
},
340320
],
@@ -356,7 +336,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
356336
errors: [
357337
{
358338
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
359-
type: "BlockStatement",
360339
line: 5,
361340
},
362341
],
@@ -375,7 +354,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
375354
errors: [
376355
{
377356
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
378-
type: "BlockStatement",
379357
line: 4,
380358
},
381359
],
@@ -394,7 +372,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
394372
errors: [
395373
{
396374
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
397-
type: "BlockStatement",
398375
line: 4,
399376
},
400377
],
@@ -413,7 +390,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
413390
errors: [
414391
{
415392
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
416-
type: "BlockStatement",
417393
line: 4,
418394
},
419395
],
@@ -432,7 +408,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
432408
errors: [
433409
{
434410
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
435-
type: "BlockStatement",
436411
line: 4,
437412
},
438413
],
@@ -451,7 +426,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
451426
errors: [
452427
{
453428
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
454-
type: "BlockStatement",
455429
line: 4,
456430
},
457431
],
@@ -471,7 +445,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
471445
errors: [
472446
{
473447
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
474-
type: "BlockStatement",
475448
line: 4,
476449
},
477450
],
@@ -491,7 +464,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
491464
errors: [
492465
{
493466
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
494-
type: "BlockStatement",
495467
line: 5,
496468
},
497469
],
@@ -511,7 +483,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
511483
errors: [
512484
{
513485
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
514-
type: "BlockStatement",
515486
line: 4,
516487
},
517488
],
@@ -531,7 +502,6 @@ ruleTester.run("no-lone-blocks", fixedUpRule, {
531502
errors: [
532503
{
533504
messageId: "redundantNestedBlock",
534-
type: "BlockStatement",
535505
line: 5,
536506
},
537507
],

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)