Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start unnamed pools #79

Open
lpil opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Start unnamed pools #79

lpil opened this issue May 15, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@lpil
Copy link
Contributor

lpil commented May 15, 2024

Hello!

Would it be possible to remove the requirement for pools to be named?

Currently if we want to dynamically connect to a database (for example, using different databases for different users in a multitenant system) we need to dynamically generate an atom and have some mechanism for recycling these atoms to avoid hitting the atom limit. This can be challenging to implement.

If we could reference the pool using a pid or a reference rather than a name we wouldn't have this issue.

Thanks,
Louis

@tsloughter
Copy link
Collaborator

Good point. I can't think of anything that would make this not possible. Only "difficulty" may be the API. I'll take a closer look and see what I can do.

@lpil
Copy link
Contributor Author

lpil commented May 15, 2024

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants