<surplus> in logical display

[arlogriffiths]

I have this chunk of code:

tinaḍaḥ rakryān· mahāmantrī I hino śrī samaravijaya <surplus>dha<lb break="no" n="B3"/>ma</surplus> suparṇa<unclear>vā</unclear>haṇa tguh uttuṅgadeva,

I wasn't sure whether I could wrap <surplus> around a chunk interrupted by <lb> but it doesn't cause any invalidation problem so at first sight I thought it was fine.

But when I see the display, I am not sure I approve of the segment encoded as superfluous being entirely invisible in logical display; and it can certainly not be our intention for this particular <lb> to become invisible in the same process.

I'd prefer {dhama} and the line beginning to be shown in both logical and physical display.

[manufrancis]

I concur with Arlo

[danbalogh]

According to our present encoding rules, <surplus> must be split across the line break. The correct encoding is <surplus>dha</surplus><lb break="no" n="B3"/><surplus>ma</surplus> and anything else should be flagged as an error by the schema. See #304 for the details.

[arlogriffiths]

Thanks for the clarification. Encoding updated.

I'll let @michaelnmmeyer close this again once he feels it's time.

[michaelnmmeyer]

Closing this as this is covered by #304.