You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As written in #3971, sending presence tends to slow down servers with little resources. A known workaround is to disable presence on the server, but there is no option other than enabling and disabling all presence. In the discussion for #3971@jpulley and @MurzNN mentioned another possible option:
Other possible workaround - make option in Synapse to disable sending presence for all federated users, or whitelist of servers to which send presence
This is something I'd love to see, personally. I want presence on my homeservers and on my friends' but I don't want it at all on the big matrix.org rooms. I would also love to be able to do something like disable presence for any room with more than X members.
Not only it helps with reducing load on the server while allowing some users to share their presence info, but I think it has privacy implications as well: Users might not want to tell everyone when they are online, just share it with friends/colleagues/collaborators on the same server or a few other. (It is now possible to have two servers: a "public" one with presence disabled, and a "private" one that would send presence, but one would not join big rooms from it. But that would be confusing and user-unfriendly.)
Therefore I think this should be implemented regardless of how #3971 is fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This issue has been migrated from #8055.
As written in #3971, sending presence tends to slow down servers with little resources. A known workaround is to disable presence on the server, but there is no option other than enabling and disabling all presence. In the discussion for #3971 @jpulley and @MurzNN mentioned another possible option:
Not only it helps with reducing load on the server while allowing some users to share their presence info, but I think it has privacy implications as well: Users might not want to tell everyone when they are online, just share it with friends/colleagues/collaborators on the same server or a few other. (It is now possible to have two servers: a "public" one with presence disabled, and a "private" one that would send presence, but one would not join big rooms from it. But that would be confusing and user-unfriendly.)
Therefore I think this should be implemented regardless of how #3971 is fixed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: