[Security Solution][Exceptions] - Improve UX for missing exception list associated with rule #76012
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
yctercero
added
Feature:Detection Rules
FrankHassanabad
approved these changes
Aug 26, 2020
Contributor
FrankHassanabad
left a comment
FrankHassanabad
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Such a great PR that we decided to do the same once twice and approve twice!
LGTM again! :-)
Contributor
Author
|
@elasticmachine merge upstream |
Contributor
💚 Build SucceededBuild metrics@kbn/optimizer bundle module count
async chunks size
distributable file count
History
To update your PR or re-run it, just comment with: |
yctercero
added a commit
to yctercero/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2020
…st associated with rule (elastic#76012) ## Summary **Current behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is in the exceptions viewer flow, they select to edit an exception item, but the list the item is associated with has since been deleted (let's say by another user) - a user is able to open modal to edit exception item and on save, an error toaster shows but no information is given to the user to indicate the issue. - **Scenario 2:** User exports rules from space 'X' and imports into space 'Y'. The exception lists associated with their newly imported rules do not exist in space 'Y' - a user goes to add an exception item and gets a modal with an error, unable to add any exceptions. - **Workaround:** current workaround exists only via API - user would need to remove the exception list from their rule via API **New behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is still able to oped edit modal, but on save they see an error explaining that the associated exception list does not exist and prompts them to remove the exception list --> now they're able to add exceptions to their rule - **Scenario 2:** User navigates to exceptions after importing their rule, tries to add exception, modal pops up with error informing them that they need to remove association to missing exception list, button prompts them to do so --> now can continue adding exceptions to rule
yctercero
added a commit
to yctercero/kibana
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 26, 2020
…st associated with rule (elastic#76012) ## Summary **Current behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is in the exceptions viewer flow, they select to edit an exception item, but the list the item is associated with has since been deleted (let's say by another user) - a user is able to open modal to edit exception item and on save, an error toaster shows but no information is given to the user to indicate the issue. - **Scenario 2:** User exports rules from space 'X' and imports into space 'Y'. The exception lists associated with their newly imported rules do not exist in space 'Y' - a user goes to add an exception item and gets a modal with an error, unable to add any exceptions. - **Workaround:** current workaround exists only via API - user would need to remove the exception list from their rule via API **New behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is still able to oped edit modal, but on save they see an error explaining that the associated exception list does not exist and prompts them to remove the exception list --> now they're able to add exceptions to their rule - **Scenario 2:** User navigates to exceptions after importing their rule, tries to add exception, modal pops up with error informing them that they need to remove association to missing exception list, button prompts them to do so --> now can continue adding exceptions to rule # Conflicts: # x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/common/components/exceptions/add_exception_modal/index.tsx # x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/common/components/exceptions/edit_exception_modal/index.test.tsx # x-pack/plugins/security_solution/public/common/components/exceptions/edit_exception_modal/index.tsx
yctercero
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2020
…st associated with rule (#76012) (#76049) ## Summary **Current behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is in the exceptions viewer flow, they select to edit an exception item, but the list the item is associated with has since been deleted (let's say by another user) - a user is able to open modal to edit exception item and on save, an error toaster shows but no information is given to the user to indicate the issue. - **Scenario 2:** User exports rules from space 'X' and imports into space 'Y'. The exception lists associated with their newly imported rules do not exist in space 'Y' - a user goes to add an exception item and gets a modal with an error, unable to add any exceptions. - **Workaround:** current workaround exists only via API - user would need to remove the exception list from their rule via API **New behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is still able to oped edit modal, but on save they see an error explaining that the associated exception list does not exist and prompts them to remove the exception list --> now they're able to add exceptions to their rule - **Scenario 2:** User navigates to exceptions after importing their rule, tries to add exception, modal pops up with error informing them that they need to remove association to missing exception list, button prompts them to do so --> now can continue adding exceptions to rule
yctercero
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 27, 2020
…ion list associated with rule (#76012) (#76052) * [Security Solution][Exceptions] - Improve UX for missing exception list associated with rule (#76012) ## Summary **Current behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is in the exceptions viewer flow, they select to edit an exception item, but the list the item is associated with has since been deleted (let's say by another user) - a user is able to open modal to edit exception item and on save, an error toaster shows but no information is given to the user to indicate the issue. - **Scenario 2:** User exports rules from space 'X' and imports into space 'Y'. The exception lists associated with their newly imported rules do not exist in space 'Y' - a user goes to add an exception item and gets a modal with an error, unable to add any exceptions. - **Workaround:** current workaround exists only via API - user would need to remove the exception list from their rule via API **New behavior:** - **Scenario 1:** User is still able to oped edit modal, but on save they see an error explaining that the associated exception list does not exist and prompts them to remove the exception list --> now they're able to add exceptions to their rule - **Scenario 2:** User navigates to exceptions after importing their rule, tries to add exception, modal pops up with error informing them that they need to remove association to missing exception list, button prompts them to do so --> now can continue adding exceptions to rule
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This PR follows #75898 that was reverted due to old mock references. Fixed here.
Please see above linked PR for details.