-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Collect multiple paths from XContentMapValues #68540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c10c884
Collect multiple paths from XContentMapValues
f72df81
iter
52d2d90
iter
af5407c
Revert "iter"
96e7bb4
Add tests on FieldFetcher level
eb98e27
forbiddenapis
e4d1e4e
Merge branch 'master' into fix-68215
elasticmachine 89972eb
Merge branch 'master' into fix-68215
elasticmachine File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What happens if we have
"foo.cat" : ["miaw", "purr"]here? I guess we get a List that contains a String and a further List, which is probably fine given that this is an edge case already.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point. I think flattening out the list in this case makes sense and is doable. In the end we only need to handle single values and lists here. I added a commit along those lines and extended the test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks like it breaks a bunch of assumptions in tests - let's leave it as it was previously, with the mix of values? As I said, I think it's a sufficiently rare case that having an odd-looking response in fetch is fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Saw the tests, probably just a class cast issue that I overlooked. Will see how easy it is to fix
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, I can see how this gets tricky now, rolled back the last change. I added a test to the FieldFetcherTests though that shows that although we might return a List that contains a String and a further List in this case via XContentMapValues (which can even be considered to be correct, depending on the viewpoint), we unpack this e.g. when retrieving fields values to a simple list.