RFE: API/Feature Coverage Comparison Table #203
bryceschober
started this conversation in
Ideas and new features
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I would be helpful to have a rough comparison table that would be maintained to help set our expectations with regard to feature and/or API coverage across the several APIs. Perhaps especially in the C/C++ language options, it's not straightforward to find the differences between the base
zenoh-rsimplementation and thezenoh-cwrapper vs. thezenoh-picoimplementation, and how those might "feed forward" into thezenoh-cppinterface(s).Some form of this table would be especially helpful to include links to relevant API doc sections, corresponding tests, or roadmap items.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions