Skip to content

WASM: Enable System.Threading.Tasks.Dataflow tests #38723

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 3, 2020

Conversation

akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

With the recent async Tasks fix we can now skip just a handful of tests to get the testsuite to passing: Tests run: 317, Errors: 0, Failures: 0, Skipped: 18. Time: 18.780363s

With the recent async Tasks fix we can now skip just a handful of tests to get the testsuite to passing: `Tests run: 317, Errors: 0, Failures: 0, Skipped: 18. Time: 18.780363s`
@akoeplinger akoeplinger requested review from steveisok and mdh1418 July 2, 2020 20:28
@akoeplinger akoeplinger requested a review from marek-safar as a code owner July 2, 2020 20:28
@Dotnet-GitSync-Bot
Copy link
Collaborator

I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this PR. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 2, 2020

Tagging subscribers to this area: @tarekgh
Notify danmosemsft if you want to be subscribed.

@@ -1121,6 +1121,7 @@ public async Task TestReceiveAsync_ManyInOrder()
}

[Fact]
[PlatformSpecific(~TestPlatforms.Browser)] // uses a lot of stack
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Were this and TestOutputAvailableAsync_LongSequence the only ones to use a lot of the stack? Were there other indications that led to skipping the test with PlatformSpecific rather than ConditionalFact?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah and to be honest they didn't really show up during my testing on wasm but from a conversation I saw on Slack where @BrzVlad recommended we disable this test when using the interpreter so I figured wasm is in the same boat: https://xamarinhq.slack.com/archives/C03CELHQQ/p1593621506218500 😄

Copy link
Member

@mdh1418 mdh1418 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@akoeplinger akoeplinger merged commit c3ab1cf into dotnet:master Jul 3, 2020
@akoeplinger akoeplinger deleted the wasm-sys-threading-dataflow branch July 3, 2020 00:54
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 8, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants