Skip to content

[main] Source code updates from dotnet/dotnet #115114

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dotnet-maestro dotnet-maestro bot commented Apr 28, 2025

Note

This is a codeflow update. It may contain both source code changes from the VMR as well as dependency updates. Learn more here.

This pull request brings the following source code changes

From https://github.com/dotnet/dotnet

Updated Dependencies

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 28, 2025
@akoeplinger akoeplinger added area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Apr 28, 2025
@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

The source-build failure will be fixed by the next dependency flow

@steveisok
Copy link
Member

The source-build failure will be fixed by the next dependency flow

YOLO merge?

@akoeplinger
Copy link
Member

No we should wait for the arcade changes, but looks like the latest commit doesn't have them either, the next one will though.

@ViktorHofer
Copy link
Member

Fixes dotnet/source-build#5091

@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer merged commit b11923d into main Apr 29, 2025
161 of 166 checks passed
@ViktorHofer ViktorHofer deleted the darc-main-d312d8d4-e45c-4fc1-91ee-d31a1ef78709 branch April 29, 2025 21:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants