JIT: Avoid comparing regnums in GenTreeHWIntrinsic::Equals
#110535
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Register numbers are not part of the syntax of JIT IR, so it does not need to be compared for the purpose of this function. At the same time we can hit asserts for nodes that aren't multi-reg nodes. Fix dotnet#110316
ghost
added
the
area-CodeGen-coreclr
This was referenced Dec 9, 2024
Open
Member
Author
|
PTAL @dotnet/jit-contrib |
AndyAyersMS
approved these changes
Dec 10, 2024
hez2010
pushed a commit
to hez2010/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 14, 2024
…110535) Register numbers are not part of the syntax of JIT IR, so it does not need to be compared for the purpose of this function. At the same time we can hit asserts for nodes that aren't multi-reg nodes. Fix dotnet#110316
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Register numbers are not part of the syntax of JIT IR, so it does not need to be compared for the purpose of this function. At the same time we can hit asserts for nodes that aren't multi-reg nodes when we try to ask for the second register.
Fix #110316