Skip to content

[release/6.0] Update ESRP Code Signing #103895

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

dkurepa
Copy link
Member

@dkurepa dkurepa commented Jun 24, 2024

Port of #102948

@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Jun 24, 2024
@dkurepa
Copy link
Member Author

dkurepa commented Jun 24, 2024

@hoyosjs
Copy link
Member

hoyosjs commented Jun 24, 2024

@carlossanlop should this go to staging? Consider this and #103896 signed off by me. I am just deferring to you for branches + prodcon.

@mmitche mmitche changed the base branch from release/6.0 to release/6.0-staging June 25, 2024 15:53
@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Jun 25, 2024

I've changed this to staging.

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Jun 25, 2024

Changed to staging.

@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Jun 25, 2024

@carlossanlop Please merge when possible

Copy link
Contributor

@carlossanlop carlossanlop left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

CI failures are all unrelated.

@carlossanlop carlossanlop added the Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release label Jul 3, 2024
@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 073a0e1 into dotnet:release/6.0-staging Jul 3, 2024
241 of 291 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants