Skip to content

Use the standard nothrow tag instead of our own type #101811

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky commented May 2, 2024

This ensures that we actually override the global operator new(size_t, const std::nothrow_t&) allocator, helping avoid mixed-allocator problems.

Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @mangod9
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@am11
Copy link
Member

am11 commented May 2, 2024

Thanks! By any chance, does it fix #101708? If so, we can try to run the spmi pipeline.

@jkoritzinsky
Copy link
Member Author

I found it while investigating that. I don't think this PR will fix it, but I have a follow-up after this one that should fix it.

@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky merged commit a2635e1 into dotnet:main May 2, 2024
87 of 89 checks passed
@jkoritzinsky jkoritzinsky deleted the nothrow branch May 2, 2024 22:52
michaelgsharp pushed a commit to michaelgsharp/runtime that referenced this pull request May 9, 2024
Ruihan-Yin pushed a commit to Ruihan-Yin/runtime that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 2, 2024
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants