Skip to content

Issues: dotnet/roslyn-analyzers

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clear current search query, filters, and sorts
6 Open 14 Closed
6 Open 14 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Struct constructor with only optional parameters not used Area-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers Category-Design Rules supporting .NET Framework Design Guidelines untriaged
#7179 opened Feb 4, 2024 by bjornhellander
2
Do not flag for CA1056 on members decorated as [DataMember] Area-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers Category-Design Rules supporting .NET Framework Design Guidelines Need More Info
#4935 opened Mar 9, 2021 by RowlandShaw Unknown
4
CA1002: Return part: only for virtual members - or better description Category-Design Rules supporting .NET Framework Design Guidelines False_Positive A diagnostic is reported for non-problematic case Needs-Review
#4508 opened Dec 6, 2020 by skrysmanski Unknown
11
Prevent breaking design change diagnostic on public API members Category-Design Rules supporting .NET Framework Design Guidelines Feature Request help wanted The issue is up-for-grabs, and can be claimed by commenting
#3912 opened Jul 26, 2020 by Evangelink Unknown
5
Update Dispose pattern rule to handle DisposeAsync pattern Category-Design Rules supporting .NET Framework Design Guidelines Feature Request Needs-Review
#3909 opened Jul 25, 2020 by Evangelink Unknown
@sharwell
1
Add an analyzer to require optional parameters be specified for internal invocations Approved-Rule Indicates if the new proposed rule has been approved to move to implementation phase Area-Microsoft.CodeAnalysis.NetAnalyzers Category-Design Rules supporting .NET Framework Design Guidelines Feature Request help wanted The issue is up-for-grabs, and can be claimed by commenting
#1240 opened Jun 23, 2017 by evildour Unknown
6
ProTip! What’s not been updated in a month: updated:<2024-09-20.