Change code coverage build pool to correct pool #6647
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
michaelgsharp
requested review from
tannergooding,
LittleLittleCloud and
JakeRadMSFT
Codecov Report
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #6647 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 68.53% 68.59% +0.05%
==========================================
Files 1200 1200
Lines 250287 250287
Branches 26093 26093
==========================================
+ Hits 171526 171674 +148
+ Misses 71929 71798 -131
+ Partials 6832 6815 -17
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. |
tannergooding
approved these changes
May 3, 2023
ghost
locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changed code coverage build pool to the correct pool. These machines are more powerful so hopefully code coverage runs faster and is less flaky.