Skip to content

Conversation

@StefanTischler
Copy link
Contributor

@StefanTischler StefanTischler commented Nov 7, 2022

A new board revision of Raspberry Pi Compute Module 4 is available on the market. This is revision is not yet detected by this library.

This PR adds the new revision number 0x3141 to the library.

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@ghost ghost added the area-System.Device.Gpio Contains types for using general-purpose I/O (GPIO) pins label Nov 7, 2022
@raffaeler
Copy link
Contributor

I never found an updated document listing all the updated revisions. This is the most updated one that I know: https://www.raspberrypi.com/documentation/computers/raspberry-pi.html#new-style-revision-codes-in-use

Anyway, if you tested it, it is fine :)

@StefanTischler
Copy link
Contributor Author

StefanTischler commented Nov 7, 2022

The docs don't mention it, sadly, but they also state, that they "are not an exhaustive list", so i guess it's just undocumented.
I have a new CM4 here though, and it states revision a03141 (a is for 1 GB RAM) ;)

Copy link
Member

@krwq krwq left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fine with me assuming you've tested this :)

@raffaeler
Copy link
Contributor

The docs don't mention it, sadly, but they also state, that they "are not an exhaustive list", so i guess it's just undocumented. I have a new CM4 here though, and it states revision a03141 (a is for 1 GB RAM) ;)

Yes, I sadly noticed the "are not an exhaustive list" statement.

@krwq krwq merged commit 4572bdf into dotnet:main Nov 7, 2022
richlander pushed a commit to richlander/iot that referenced this pull request Nov 12, 2022
@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 8, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

area-System.Device.Gpio Contains types for using general-purpose I/O (GPIO) pins

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants