Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support value conversion for ReadOnlyIPAddress #25587

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 23, 2021

Conversation

roji
Copy link
Member

@roji roji commented Aug 19, 2021

Note that after this PR, the SQL gets generated with a useless conversion: WHERE [b].[Address] = CAST(N'127.0.0.1' AS nvarchar(45)). We should be able to remove the convert node when its type mapping is identical to its operands, but for this to be correct we need to be able to fully compare type mappings... Leaving this for now (@smitpatel do we have this tracked/discussed somewhere?)

Fixes #21159

@smitpatel
Copy link
Member

Somewhat related issue is #15586

Though in this case the reason for extra Cast is different than any other existing issue we have. Either investigate and avoid it or file an issue with details.

Also add a test which covers the code path.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Aug 19, 2021

@smitpatel added test for this, will open a separate issue to remove the convert node, as it isn't an actual problem etc.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 19, 2021

Hello @roji!

Because this pull request has the auto-merge label, I will be glad to assist with helping to merge this pull request once all check-in policies pass.

p.s. you can customize the way I help with merging this pull request, such as holding this pull request until a specific person approves. Simply @mention me (@msftbot) and give me an instruction to get started! Learn more here.

@roji
Copy link
Member Author

roji commented Aug 19, 2021

Issue: #25597

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 19, 2021

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:

  1. Azure Pipelines

These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check.

Give feedback on this
From the bot dev team

We've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments.

Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 20, 2021

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:

  1. Azure Pipelines

These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check.

Give feedback on this
From the bot dev team

We've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments.

Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin.

@roji roji removed the auto-merge label Aug 20, 2021
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 23, 2021

Apologies, while this PR appears ready to be merged, I've been configured to only merge when all checks have explicitly passed. The following integrations have not reported any progress on their checks and are blocking auto-merge:

  1. Azure Pipelines

These integrations are possibly never going to report a check, and unblocking auto-merge likely requires a human being to update my configuration to exempt these integrations from requiring a passing check.

Give feedback on this
From the bot dev team

We've tried to tune the bot such that it posts a comment like this only when auto-merge is blocked for exceptional, non-intuitive reasons. When the bot's auto-merge capability is properly configured, auto-merge should operate as you would intuitively expect and you should not see any spurious comments.

Please reach out to us at fabricbotservices@microsoft.com to provide feedback if you believe you're seeing this comment appear spuriously. Please note that we usually are unable to update your bot configuration on your team's behalf, but we're happy to help you identify your bot admin.

@roji roji merged commit cda096e into release/6.0 Aug 23, 2021
@roji roji deleted the roji/ReadOnlyIPAddress branch August 23, 2021 17:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Convert node introduced to upcast IPAddress.Loopback causes translation failure
3 participants