This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 23, 2023. It is now read-only.
Don't compact LOH just because a heap_hard_limit exists #23366
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Don't compact LOH just because a heap_hard_limit exists
This is based on a perf test with 100% survival in a container, before
and after #22180. GC pause times were greater after that commit.
Debugging showed that the reason was that after, we were always doing
compacting GC, and objects were staying in generation 1 and not making it
to generation 2. The reason was that in the "after" build,
should_compact_loh()
was always returning true if heap_hard_limit wasset; currently if we do an LOH compaction, we compact all other
generations too. As the comment indicates, we should decide that
automatically, not just set it to true all the time.