Skip to content

Windows Setup Fix for Non-Administrator Users #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Windows Setup Fix for Non-Administrator Users #90

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

meyerrj
Copy link

@meyerrj meyerrj commented Jun 22, 2014

I've resolved an issue where non-administrator users could not use the scripts to setup KVM.

I encountered an issue where Windows cannot access the script files if they're not in an administrator owned folder.

I've modified the script so that it only install to the user's home folder by default. If a user wants to install it globally, they can use the -g or -global switch to install it there, and only there.

meyerrj added 4 commits June 22, 2014 17:13
I've modified the setup function to check for the global flag.

The script will no longer attempt to install KVM globally and locally.
The -g flag can allow it to be installed system-wide.
Modified the kvminstall script for my forked repository...
Note to self, the GitHub client is horrible as single-file commits...
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

@meyerrj thanks for the PR. Have you filed out a CLA (https://github.com/aspnet/Home/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#contributing-code-and-content)? After doing that, kvm changes should be made in https://github.com/aspnet/KRuntime/tree/dev/setup

@meyerrj
Copy link
Author

meyerrj commented Jun 23, 2014

@davidfowl Thanks for pointing that out. Looks like I'll have to check with my employer tomorrow, hopefully they won't have a problem with it. :)

@glennc
Copy link
Contributor

glennc commented Jun 26, 2014

@meyerrj Did you have any issues with the CLA?

@meyerrj
Copy link
Author

meyerrj commented Jun 26, 2014

@glennc It's been sent to my employer's legal department... I've been told it might take a few weeks before I hear back. I'm hoping they won't have an issue with it.

@glennc
Copy link
Contributor

glennc commented Jun 26, 2014

@meyerrj Great, let us know how it goes.

@meyerrj
Copy link
Author

meyerrj commented Jul 31, 2014

I just wanted to follow up with my paperwork status. The paperwork is still working its way through my employer (state university), but it is progressing... I'm keeping my fingers crossed. :)

I also noticed that there are now merge conflicts. Should I cancel this pull request and revisit submitting patches once the paperwork is officially ironed out?

@glennc
Copy link
Contributor

glennc commented Sep 10, 2014

@meyerrj You can leave this one or cancel it if you wish. Once the CLA is done then you have to get it into a state that we can merge again. It's up to you if you want to cancel and resubmit it later or just re-base this one.

@meyerrj meyerrj closed this Sep 22, 2014
natemcmaster pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 9, 2018
ryanbrandenburg pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
natemcmaster pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 30, 2018
…d on resourcetype's name instead of full name
Jesusdebug pushed a commit to Jesusdebug/aspnetcore that referenced this pull request May 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants