Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Stop health checks running until the underlying resource enters the running state. #5601

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Stop health checks running until the underlying resource enters the running state. #5601

merged 8 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

mitchdenny
Copy link
Member

@mitchdenny mitchdenny commented Sep 9, 2024 •
edited by dotnet-policy-service bot
Loading

Description

Adds a service to the container which replaces the predicate on HealthCheckPublisherOptions and only enables checks when a resource associated with it is in a Running state (once enabled they stay enabled). It also reduces the period to 5 seconds.

Checklist

  • Is this feature complete?
    • Yes. Ready to ship.
    • No. Follow-up changes expected.
  • Are you including unit tests for the changes and scenario tests if relevant?
    • Yes
    • No (existing tests cover this, if it isn't working the tests will fail)
  • Did you add public API?
    • Yes
      • If yes, did you have an API Review for it?
        • Yes
        • No
      • Did you add <remarks /> and <code /> elements on your triple slash comments?
        • Yes
        • No
    • No
  • Does the change make any security assumptions or guarantees?
    • Yes
      • If yes, have you done a threat model and had a security review?
        • Yes
        • No
    • No
  • Does the change require an update in our Aspire docs?
    • Yes
      • Link to aspire-docs issue:
    • No
Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Sep 9, 2024
@mitchdenny mitchdenny mentioned this pull request Sep 9, 2024
Open
mitchdenny and others added 4 commits September 10, 2024 01:09
@mitchdenny @davidfowl
Update appsettings.json
b565483 
Co-authored-by: David Fowler <davidfowl@gmail.com>
@mitchdenny @davidfowl
Update appsettings.json
51e18f3 
Co-authored-by: David Fowler <davidfowl@gmail.com>
@mitchdenny @davidfowl
Update appsettings.json
c7d3b76 
Co-authored-by: David Fowler <davidfowl@gmail.com>
@mitchdenny @davidfowl
Update appsettings.json
86597ba 
Co-authored-by: David Fowler <davidfowl@gmail.com>
@davidfowl davidfowl added area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication and removed needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners labels Sep 9, 2024
@mitchdenny mitchdenny enabled auto-merge (squash) September 9, 2024 15:13
@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines Azure Pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@davidfowl
Copy link
Member

/azp run

@azure-pipelines Azure Pipelines
Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@mitchdenny mitchdenny merged commit f29be7b into main Sep 10, 2024
11 checks passed
@mitchdenny mitchdenny deleted the mitchdenny/healthcheck-control branch September 10, 2024 03:39
radical pushed a commit to radical/aspire that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
@mitchdenny @radical
Stop health checks running until the underlying resource enters the r…
f0ab1b9 
…unning state. (dotnet#5601)
@build-analysis build-analysis bot mentioned this pull request Sep 11, 2024
Open
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@davidfowl davidfowl davidfowl approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-app-model Issues pertaining to the APIs in Aspire.Hosting, e.g. DistributedApplication
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@mitchdenny @davidfowl