Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refinement of Feature Details to Align with DotCMS Design System #27120

Open
3 tasks
oidacra opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
3 tasks

Refinement of Feature Details to Align with DotCMS Design System #27120

oidacra opened this issue Dec 27, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@oidacra
Copy link
Member

oidacra commented Dec 27, 2023

Parent Issue

User Story

As a developer, I need to align the DotCMS feature implementation with the existing Design System, ensuring consistency and adherence to predefined styles and components.

Acceptance Criteria

Update/ Apply design system in Experiment

Proposed Objective

User Experience

Proposed Priority

Priority 2 - Important

External Links

Assumptions & Initiation Needs

Assume existing components in the Design System can be directly implemented without major modifications. Initiation will require a review of the current implementation versus the Design System guidelines.

Quality Assurance Notes & Workarounds

QA should focus on visual alignment with the Design System, functional consistency, and responsiveness of the updated components.

Sub-Tasks & Estimates

Tasks

  1. OKR : User Experience Team : Falcon Type : Enhancement dotCMS : Experiments
  2. OKR : User Experience Team : Falcon Type : Enhancement dotCMS : Experiments
  3. OKR : User Experience Team : Falcon Type : Enhancement dotCMS : Experiments
@oidacra oidacra changed the title Fix details that are different from those defined in the new dotCMS design system Refinement of Feature Details to Align with DotCMS Design System Dec 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Future
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants