Commit a29bec2
committed
oauth/api: drain timer channel on each iteration
Previously, if while polling for oauth device-code login results a user
suspended the process (such as with CTRL-Z) and then restored it with
`fg`, an error might occur in the form of:
```
failed waiting for authentication: You are polling faster than the specified interval of 5 seconds.
```
This is due to our use of a `time.Ticker` here - if no receiver drains
the ticker channel (and timers/tickers use a buffered channel behind the
scenes), more than one tick will pile up, causing the program to "tick"
twice, in fast succession, after it is resumed.
The new implementation replaces the `time.Ticker` with a `time.Timer`
(`time.Ticker` is just a nice wrapper) and introduces a helper function
`resetTimer` to ensure that before every `select`, the timer is stopped
and it's channel is drained.
Signed-off-by: Laura Brehm <laurabrehm@hey.com>1 parent 3826f5a commit a29bec2
1 file changed
+37
-4
lines changed| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| |||
96 | 96 | | |
97 | 97 | | |
98 | 98 | | |
99 | | - | |
| 99 | + | |
| 100 | + | |
| 101 | + | |
100 | 102 | | |
101 | | - | |
| 103 | + | |
| 104 | + | |
| 105 | + | |
| 106 | + | |
| 107 | + | |
| 108 | + | |
| 109 | + | |
| 110 | + | |
| 111 | + | |
| 112 | + | |
| 113 | + | |
| 114 | + | |
| 115 | + | |
102 | 116 | | |
103 | 117 | | |
| 118 | + | |
104 | 119 | | |
105 | 120 | | |
| 121 | + | |
106 | 122 | | |
107 | 123 | | |
108 | | - | |
| 124 | + | |
| 125 | + | |
109 | 126 | | |
110 | 127 | | |
111 | 128 | | |
| |||
119 | 136 | | |
120 | 137 | | |
121 | 138 | | |
122 | | - | |
| 139 | + | |
| 140 | + | |
123 | 141 | | |
124 | 142 | | |
125 | 143 | | |
126 | 144 | | |
127 | 145 | | |
| 146 | + | |
| 147 | + | |
| 148 | + | |
| 149 | + | |
| 150 | + | |
| 151 | + | |
| 152 | + | |
| 153 | + | |
| 154 | + | |
| 155 | + | |
| 156 | + | |
| 157 | + | |
| 158 | + | |
| 159 | + | |
| 160 | + | |
128 | 161 | | |
129 | 162 | | |
130 | 163 | | |
| |||
0 commit comments