You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, there's a 'copy number' hotkey, which as far as I can see copies the unique number assigned by GH for that highlighted item. But then when you go up into the search, I'm not seeing a 'paste number'. Manually pasting it from the usual shell shortcut doesn't include the hash symbol, so just leaves a raw number as part of the search, which seems kinda useless?
Manually prepending a hash to doesn't seem to filter out that item in the list.
Now I'm guessing the intention was to take the number elsewhere to mention, aye? In that case I still think you really want the prefix hash at least. But it also seems like perhaps #X should be processed in the search as specifically asking for the thing that was copied, so the sake of easier and more intuitive usage.
(As a side note, I'm again sure this isn't the original intent, but being able to do something like `@me/repo' would also be really quite useful. Perhaps I'm a touch married to super intuitive and lazy usage of things over being very strict about search, but I know I'd enjoy being to to do things like this. I know this isn't 'lazygithub', though I kinda wish it was. =P)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
So, there's a 'copy number' hotkey, which as far as I can see copies the unique number assigned by GH for that highlighted item. But then when you go up into the search, I'm not seeing a 'paste number'. Manually pasting it from the usual shell shortcut doesn't include the hash symbol, so just leaves a raw number as part of the search, which seems kinda useless?
Manually prepending a hash to doesn't seem to filter out that item in the list.
Now I'm guessing the intention was to take the number elsewhere to mention, aye? In that case I still think you really want the prefix hash at least. But it also seems like perhaps
#X
should be processed in the search as specifically asking for the thing that was copied, so the sake of easier and more intuitive usage.(As a side note, I'm again sure this isn't the original intent, but being able to do something like `@me/repo' would also be really quite useful. Perhaps I'm a touch married to super intuitive and lazy usage of things over being very strict about search, but I know I'd enjoy being to to do things like this. I know this isn't 'lazygithub', though I kinda wish it was. =P)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: