Skip to content

offer .lhs() and .rhs() for all binary expressions #5044

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 22, 2019

Conversation

kroening
Copy link
Member

This is follow up from #5025. A clear desire is visible to use .lhs() and
.rhs() on binary expressions, say minus_exprt.

  • Each commit message has a non-empty body, explaining why the change was made.
  • n/a Methods or procedures I have added are documented, following the guidelines provided in CODING_STANDARD.md.
  • n/a The feature or user visible behaviour I have added or modified has been documented in the User Guide in doc/cprover-manual/
  • Regression or unit tests are included, or existing tests cover the modified code (in this case I have detailed which ones those are in the commit message).
  • n/a My commit message includes data points confirming performance improvements (if claimed).
  • My PR is restricted to a single feature or bugfix.
  • n/a White-space or formatting changes outside the feature-related changed lines are in commits of their own.

This is follow up from #5025.  A clear desire is visible to use .lhs() and
.rhs() on binary expressions, say minus_exprt.
{
return exprt::op1();
}

// make op0 and op1 public
using exprt::op0;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⛏️ These are probably not required any more right? Should be marked as deprecated at least

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is coming (they can only be marked deprecated once all uses are removed, or CI will fail).

Copy link
Collaborator

@martin-cs martin-cs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approve modulo @thk123 's comment.

Copy link
Contributor

@allredj allredj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✔️
Passed Diffblue compatibility checks (cbmc commit: dfb9421).
Build URL: https://travis-ci.com/diffblue/test-gen/builds/124106593

@kroening kroening merged commit c9284ae into develop Aug 22, 2019
@kroening kroening deleted the binary_infix_exprt branch August 22, 2019 09:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants