Skip to content

Initial minimal port for jumperless v5 (micropython) #2

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

detiber
Copy link
Owner

@detiber detiber commented Jun 14, 2025

Thanks for submitting a pull request to CircuitPython! Remove these instructions before submitting.

See https://learn.adafruit.com/contribute-to-circuitpython-with-git-and-github for detailed instructions.

  • Consider whether to submit this PR against main or against (if it exists) the branch for the current stable release or an upcoming minor release. The branch will be named i.j.x, for example, 9.2.x. Bug fixes and minor enhancements can be submitted against the stable release branch, and will be merged to main regularly.
  • Create your own fork of circuitpython and create a branch for your changes.
  • Use pre-commit to check your commits before submitting. See https://learn.adafruit.com/contribute-to-circuitpython-with-git-and-github/check-your-code.
  • Test your changes and tell us how you tested.

@detiber detiber changed the title Initial minimal port for jumperless v5 Initial minimal port for jumperless v5 (micropython) Jun 14, 2025
@detiber
Copy link
Owner Author

detiber commented Jun 14, 2025

TODO (from Discord): add some safety around dacs
If you set GPIO 16 (RESET for the crossbars) high, and just send I2C to the dacs to put them in the middle of their range (or bonus points if you grab
[calibration] top_rail_zero = 1630;
[calibration] bottom_rail_zero = 1618;
[calibration] dac_0_zero = 1626;
[calibration] dac_1_zero = 1626;
from the config and set that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant