refactor(http): remove unstable header and method modules

[tomas-zijdemans]

If we want to keep it, then these should be considered for merging instead: #6991 and #6992

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.20%. Comparing base (54c6107) to head (350c3ca).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7004      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.22%   94.20%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         617      615       -2     
  Lines       48569    48356     -213     
  Branches     8534     8534              
==========================================
- Hits        45765    45552     -213     
  Misses       2736     2736              
  Partials       68       68              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[kt3k]

note: these were originally added in #4317 and #4320

what do people think?

cc @halvardssm

[halvardssm]

What is the reasoning for removing them?

I personally find it quite useful to have such headers and other static properties defined in the standard library as it reduces the amount of accidental typos.

Not against keeping them in sync with the IANA registry.

[tomas-zijdemans]

What is the reasoning for removing them?

Please see the discussion here: https://discord.com/channels/684898665143206084/775393009981849600/1472185311118495796