Skip to content

Conversation

@delta1
Copy link
Owner

@delta1 delta1 commented Dec 12, 2024

No description provided.


BITCOIN_DAEMON_NAME=elementsd
BITCOIN_GUI_NAME=elements-qt
BITCOIN_TEST_NAME=test_bitcoin
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

test_elements ?

@delta1 delta1 force-pushed the merged-master branch 5 times, most recently from b706b27 to c794f76 Compare January 6, 2025 13:29
@delta1 delta1 force-pushed the merged-master branch 6 times, most recently from c0fb941 to b6ea43a Compare April 22, 2025 09:48
@delta1 delta1 force-pushed the merged-master branch 2 times, most recently from 0b2d6a4 to 0c1e24a Compare May 8, 2025 11:57
delta1 and others added 28 commits July 5, 2025 18:44
chore: replaced the non-working travis badge with a release
…olve_data

Removed duplicate solving_data for transaction funding RPCs
@delta1 delta1 closed this Jul 9, 2025
tomt1664 pushed a commit to tomt1664/elements that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2026
This changed the node pruning logic and moved test/functional/feature_blockfilterindex_prune.py
to test/functional/feature_index_prune.py.

Please verify that:
1. I migrated the test correctly
2. The magic numbers in the test look fine

With respect to delta1#2: I believe the magic numbers are wrong. I previously had to tweak them heavily
in commit 1278b31. I don't think I did it correctly then, and so I don't believe them to be correct now.

To summarize what this tweaking was: I changed the magic numbers in the test to work properly,
but I suspect that in changing them, I may have nullified what the test was testing.

It's very possible that the reason the test was failing was because of an underlying bug with the pruning
in elements which we have to fix, rather than just being an issue with the test itself.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants