Align IDIDManager interface with DID Registration spec #959
peacekeeper
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment
-
Thank you for bringing this to our attention, I think it makes a lot of sense to try to implement this, or at least to try to align the concepts. I'll repost this as an issue since it's very likely we'll start prioritizing it: #960 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
At DIF we've been working on a specification called "DID Registration", which defines inputs and outputs of the DID create/update/deactivate operations, see here:
https://identity.foundation/did-registration/
Just like DID Resolution, these are abstract functions which can be implemented in various ways, e.g. as a local SDK, remote HTTP service, etc. There is also the Universal Registrar implementation of this at DIF: https://github.com/decentralized-identity/universal-registrar
The DID Registration specification seems to have some overlap with Veramo's IDIDManager interface. Perhaps it would be useful to align your interface with the specification, or conversely, incorporate ideas from your interface into the specification.
Markus
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions