Skip to content

Feature/azure datalake #667

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

EmmaZhao12
Copy link

@EmmaZhao12 EmmaZhao12 commented Feb 27, 2025

  • Tests pass
  • json check schema for azure (storageAccount)
  • Fixed missing storageAccount in mapping odcs_v3

@jochenchrist
Copy link
Contributor

Azure datalake is already supported: https://cli.datacontract.com/#azure

What is not sufficient there?

I am very reluctant adding new dependencies as we already have a lot of trouble managing all the transitive dependencies.

@Auguronomics
Copy link

Auguronomics commented Mar 2, 2025

Azure datalake is already supported: https://cli.datacontract.com/#azure

What is not sufficient there?

I am very reluctant adding new dependencies as we already have a lot of trouble managing all the transitive dependencies.

Hi Sir, the JsonSchema check on azure storage account isn’t support in fact as S3 or GCP blob not only soda test are required,
as S3 the library comes from the same author fsspec to keep consistency between python module. The Authentication reuse the same soda azure env. variable setup too.
Thanks for your attention.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants