Skip to content

Conversation

@Carreau
Copy link
Contributor

@Carreau Carreau commented Oct 19, 2021

It is almost the same but is more consistent and future proof.

It is almost the same but is more consistent and future proof
Copy link
Member

@jrbourbeau jrbourbeau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the update @Carreau. While we're changing this line anways, maybe we should use python -m pip too? I think that's the recommended way of doing things today

@Carreau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Carreau commented Oct 19, 2021

As long as we don't invoke setup.py directly, I'm fine. I don't have a particular opinion.

Copy link
Member

@jrbourbeau jrbourbeau left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Carreau -- will merge once CI finishes up

@jrbourbeau jrbourbeau merged commit f3aa9d1 into dask:main Oct 19, 2021
@Carreau
Copy link
Contributor Author

Carreau commented Oct 19, 2021

Thanks !

zanieb pushed a commit to zanieb/distributed that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2021
It is almost the same but is more consistent and future proof
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants