Skip to content

Conversation

@PastaPastaPasta
Copy link
Member

Issue being fixed or feature implemented

See commits

Checklist:

Go over all the following points, and put an x in all the boxes that apply.

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have assigned this pull request to a milestone (for repository code-owners and collaborators only)

af85608 fix: improve governance/proposal dialog strings (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  - make strings easier to translate
  - stop translating non-translatable strings
  - use `%n` where possible

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes
  n/a

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: bba2247fc64f152656972d7e30c12eea6d892a622751c8e798a0ccb522c297356b1ae3964d9db25aa1c920eb71d862e026b0a490ddce784563aea9caa5445425
9ae459f ro (UdjinM6)
c3cc47a bg (UdjinM6)
c0c1162 vi (UdjinM6)
0970d9b ar (UdjinM6)
04d9f06 th (UdjinM6)
32651c7 ko (UdjinM6)
2c0bd3a ja (UdjinM6)
7b5e6ee zh_TW (UdjinM6)
6e243b2 zh_CN (UdjinM6)
3b5f27a tr (UdjinM6)
b609d38 sk (UdjinM6)
5179544 fi (UdjinM6)
6c3c628 pt (UdjinM6)
236f2ce pl (UdjinM6)
ddc40a9 nl (UdjinM6)
00c7afe it (UdjinM6)
bc58127 fr (UdjinM6)
6bbb222 es (UdjinM6)
fbbf013 de (UdjinM6)
fdf5645 ru (UdjinM6)
10d5bd5 en + dashstrings.cpp (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented

  NOTE: translated via Claude

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

Top commit has no ACKs.

Tree-SHA512: 0f07c9b2eaec01c4678e87d3b490ebaa1c090304c619dbf5d6db1e323b4f856b436be3ca8ac474dfbd54faae3d90b24508f2548bba2a75fca6a64fc244cdd4e3
…points, seeds and SECURITY.md for v23

0a1407b docs: update supported versions in SECURITY.md (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
8727d3c chore: update testnet seeds for v23 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e1116f6 chore: update mainnet seeds for v23 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
d9fe32f chore: drop unreachable onion seeds (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
4e52655 chore: update `m_assumed_blockchain_size` for v23 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
adb2992 chore: update minimum chain work, tx stats and checkpoints for v23 (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)

Pull request description:

  ## Additional Information

  * The blocks used as checkpoints are
    * For mainnet, block 2361500 (`0x0x0000000000000009ba1e8f47851d036bb618a4f6565eb3c32d1f647d450ff195`, [Insight](https://explorer.dash.org/insight/block/0000000000000009ba1e8f47851d036bb618a4f6565eb3c32d1f647d450ff195))
    * For testnet, block 1239600 (`0x00000107d42829a38e31c1a38c660d621e1ca376a880df1520e85e38af175d3a`, [Insight](https://insight.testnet.networks.dash.org/insight/block/00000107d42829a38e31c1a38c660d621e1ca376a880df1520e85e38af175d3a))

  * `m_assumed_{blockchain,chain_state}_size` calculations
    * Mainnet synced till block 2361620, Dash Core v22.1.3 (release)

       ```bash
       $ du --exclude ~/.dashcore/testnet3 --max-depth=0 -h ~/.dashcore
       49G     /home/debian/.dashcore
       $ python3 -c "print(round(49*1.1))" # 10% leeway
       54
       $ du --max-depth=0 -h ~/.dashcore/chainstate
       240M    /home/debian/.dashcore/chainstate
       ```

      As `m_assumed_chain_state_size` is still <1GB, we don't update it

    * Testnet synced till block 1352330, Dash Core f650f65 (pre-release)

       ```bash
       $ du --max-depth=0 -h ~/.dashcore/testnet3
       8.7G     /home/debian/.dashcore/testnet3
       $ python3 -c "print(round(8.7*1.1))" # 10% leeway
       10
       $ du --max-depth=0 -h ~/.dashcore/testnet3/chainstate
       68M    /home/debian/.dashcore/chainstate
       ```
  * Mainnet seeds generated using `protx list valid 1 2361500`, testnet seeds generated using `protx list valid 1 1353660`, commenting out deduplication ([source](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/e4fa575ac463d04a745830f43bb28daf31b41d26/contrib/seeds/makeseeds.py#L203-L205)) and raising the `MAX_SEEDS_PER_ASN` to 10 ([source](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/e4fa575ac463d04a745830f43bb28daf31b41d26/contrib/seeds/makeseeds.py#L23))

  ## Breaking Changes

  None expected.

  ## Checklist

  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 0a1407b

Tree-SHA512: c4c463b91da0a4c35b0ddadcd9a261424551f49f6889c848ae02d912671e3b6fec07b4725cecce04a755fab7443939eeb0fb51e2b53a8dbe83db7287712df095
25ecd50 fix: follow-up for 6920 to update checkpoints for testnet in man pages (Konstantin Akimov)
28a0689 fix: fixup checkpoints in man (Konstantin Akimov)
faa58da docs: update man pages for 23.0 (Konstantin Akimov)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  dashpay#6884

  ## What was done?
  updated man pages for v23 release

  ## How Has This Been Tested?
  N/A

  ## Breaking Changes
  N/A

  ## Checklist:
  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 25ecd50

Tree-SHA512: 7c72cbf0acf36ec4fb3b1b1e4fb7b480f7677e118df7ac3a0455989bb6a309190c3c1d7a38ae4f8e0f648d99bfbcef6da9c1a5efb1c616f4d0e8d8603746bd69
…ftforks]` help text, drop extra `generate`s from test, resolve macOS GID issue

39e847c fix: do not create group if GID is already taken (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
36db83a fix: annotate `getblockchaininfo[softforks]` as `OBJ_DYN` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
e4ace44 fix: repair IP extraction in `makeseeds.py`, read from `core_p2p` arr (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
9ef8c53 test: drop extra `generate`s from `wallet_signrawtransactionwithwallet` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)

Pull request description:

  ## Additional Information

  * The help text for `getblockchaininfo['softforks']` was introduced in [bitcoin#16060](bitcoin#16060) (backported in [dash#5255](dashpay#5255)) _but_ the `RPCResult` help text was introduced in [bitcoin#17809](bitcoin#17809), backported _before_ [bitcoin#16060](bitcoin#16060). This resulted in the help text for `softforks` deviating from upstream without the output to match (which is aligned with upstream).

    This has since been resolved as the output structure hasn't changed, only the help text.

  * [bitcoin#22818](bitcoin#22818) (backported in [dash#6214](dashpay#6214)) activated many softforks at height 1, which rendered the block generation calls in `wallet_signrawtransactionwithwallet.py` ([source](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/3e6e8f57c45fb24107816a10854ed8f349c4aa20/test/functional/wallet_signrawtransactionwithwallet.py#L132-L133)) no longer necessary, additionally [bitcoin#22550](bitcoin#22550) (backported in [dash#6189](dashpay#6189)) added assertions to validate CSV/CLTV activation that were not included in the backport.
    This has since been resolved, replacing the `generate` calls with assertions.

    * The locktime height was dropped from `1000` to `100` (matching with upstream, [source](https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/24.x/test/functional/wallet_signrawtransactionwithwallet.py#L219)) as we are no longer generating enough blocks to reach that height anymore.

  * `makeseeds.py` is currently mangled because [dash#6666](dashpay#6666) updated the script to look for the `core_p2p` purpose even though purpose code support was spun-off into [dash#6674](dashpay#6674). This meant, in between [dash#6666](dashpay#6666) and [dash#6674](dashpay#6674 merger, `makeseeds.py` was broken.

    This necessitated a fix that was introduced as e714c06 ([dash#6858](dashpay#6858)) but meant that after  [dash#6674](dashpay#6674), `makeseeds.py` is broken again. This has been resolved as part of this PR.

  * macOS users who want to utilise the `develop` container ([source](https://github.com/dashpay/dash/blob/b82450aa7dce2307b13e6fe282f7c4f84b48cbbf/contrib/containers/develop/Dockerfile)) need to set the `USER_ID` and `GROUP_ID` `args` to avoid permissions issues. This creates a slight problem as the GID for `staff` is 20 on macOS but Linux uses GID 20 for `dialout`, so creating a group with GID 20 will _fail_.

    As we only care about the GID, it is safe to skip the group creation step and assign the user to the group anyways as we do it by GID and _not_ name (the user will be presented as a member of the `dialout` group). This should resolve issues for macOS users trying to build the `develop` container.

  ## Breaking Changes

  None expected.

  ## Checklist

  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK 39e847c
  knst:
    utACK 39e847c
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 39e847c

Tree-SHA512: 0ecb8bb930d54d4b9024a6e94a2fe3b49c7334666e5f67d38920ac58f54332fb8b4f62bd883bd949969d60b6b5183c7a20a3593f24c2e6bbbb0de143b3de8fe1
d89646d fix: logic error in `CheckDecryptionKey` (UdjinM6)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  The issue was introduced via dashpay@392b51b

  ## What was done?

  ## How Has This Been Tested?

  ## Breaking Changes

  ## Checklist:
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  PastaPastaPasta:
    utACK d89646d
  knst:
    utACK d89646d

Tree-SHA512: 31419798b3c05bb3c4c30cf02b819c899e0d0e0048775d907099c6507afaf189d12eeb8ec33232801e1874fe9c156558e7936a43f34cce1409ca273c3bc1919c
…dition

c0faae0 fix: reuse best clsig to avoid potential race condition (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)
98dc874 trivial: use `GetBestChainLockHeight()` (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)

Pull request description:

  ## Additional Information

  Fix for potential race condition identified by CodeRabbit in [dash#6933](dashpay#6933) ([comment](dashpay#6933 (comment)))

  ## Breaking Changes

  None expected.

  ## Checklist

  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK c0faae0

Tree-SHA512: 74762c5d715405a32af4a58553c05dc2fd98cdb7f038a519cf244a7c84a6a536ff341d8e8f534dbb6a0df952730314f85c52738c4d5b2e72fa74a4f02a6b2237
…s for composite methods

5978985 fix: don't treat arrays/objects as string literals for composite methods (Kittywhiskers Van Gogh)

Pull request description:

  ## Additional Information

  thephez identified a bug where attempting to specify arrays as expected by `coreP2PAddrs`, `platformHTTPSAddrs` or `platformP2PAddrs` using `dash-cli` or the Qt wallet resulted in errors (see below)

  ```
  $ ./src/dash-cli --testnet protx register_prepare "6fe28c0ab6f1b372c1a6a246ae63f74f931e8365e15a089c68d6190000000000" 1 '["1.1.1.1:19999"]' "yhq7ifNCtTKEpY4Yu5XPCcztQco6Fh6JsZ" "93746e8731c57f87f79b3620a7982924e2931717d49540a85864bd543de11c43fb868fd63e501a1db37e19ed59ae6db4" "yTretFTpoi3oQ3maZk5QadGaDWPiKnmDBc" 0 "yNbNZyCiTYSFtDwEXt7jChV7tZVYX862ua"
  error code: -8
  error message:
  Error setting coreP2PAddrs[0] to '["1.1.1.1:19999"]' (invalid input)
  ```

  This was not caught by functional tests as they send fully formed JSON messages and do not require JSON client interpretation, which both `dash-cli` and Dash Qt require, this pull request adds additional handling to ensure that arrays and objects are interpreted if they are likely to be so (starting and ending with curly or square brackets) or otherwise passed as-is as a string.

  What this pull request _isn't_ is full fledged conversion support for composite RPC arguments to other non-string types like integers, the scope here is specifically to allow for the backwards compatibility logic for `coreP2PAddrs`, `platformHTTPSAddrs` or `platformP2PAddrs` to work as intended.

  With this pull request, the following result is expected (see below)

  ```
  $ ./src/dash-cli --testnet protx register_prepare "6fe28c0ab6f1b372c1a6a246ae63f74f931e8365e15a089c68d6190000000000" 1 '["1.1.1.1:19999"]' "yhq7ifNCtTKEpY4Yu5XPCcztQco6Fh6JsZ" "93746e8731c57f87f79b3620a7982924e2931717d49540a85864bd543de11c43fb868fd63e501a1db37e19ed59ae6db4" "yTretFTpoi3oQ3maZk5QadGaDWPiKnmDBc" 0 "yNbNZyCiTYSFtDwEXt7jChV7tZVYX862ua"
  error code: -32603
  error message:
  No funds at specified address yNbNZyCiTYSFtDwEXt7jChV7tZVYX862ua
  ```

  ## Breaking Changes

  None expected.

  ## Checklist

  - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [x] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation **(note: N/A)**
  - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    utACK 5978985

Tree-SHA512: 9271d7a4c5f463611a10c7edcb0cea929d6d7e0c07d6b962f4aca40483f84ff17b29e3d6b84c465c267734ff6e93e2148e11af0ad19ce58585ed3200fc3e3b01
9531028 security: Store mnemonic words in secure memory (pasta)
5024589 doc: Add release notes for PR dashpay#6946 (pasta)
a0b15cf refactor: Simplify wallet lock state handling in CreateWalletActivity (UdjinM6)
34914f1 feat: Add menu option to show recovery phrase for existing wallets (UdjinM6)
3b16a88 fix: Restore dialog size when going back from verification to word list (UdjinM6)
f79a750 refactor: Move wallet creation dialog styles from C++ to CSS (UdjinM6)
fd3c1eb Simplify mnemonic retrieval (pasta)
9894f47 Fix trailing whitespace in wallet creation files (pasta)
e08e29f qt: Fix potential infinite loop and missing include in mnemonic verification (pasta)
77c3aeb qt: Improve wallet creation UI flow (pasta)
f3219ee qt: avoid modifying QString during regex iteration in GUIUtil::loadStyleSheet (pasta)

Pull request description:

  ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented
  Improve QT wallet creation process to display the seed to users. Release notes tbd

  ## What was done?
  <img width="438" height="236" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 07 38" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c7fda5bf-cb5f-4ccb-a3a3-7c74c1f01ce8" />
  <img width="425" height="332" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 07 50" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3861b0bc-6f53-41e9-b800-12e7e81b1524" />
  <img width="573" height="403" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 08 09" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bffd2400-5cf0-4d34-9ec4-f8f2a875cbfa" />
  <img width="560" height="396" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 08 18" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/36a54cc2-9422-4f79-82c4-cbadd1127910" />
  <img width="480" height="383" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 08 42" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/02e31e2c-f7bf-49ca-a13e-2a04a824c7ad" />
  <img width="474" height="379" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 09 10" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/35cc1169-b616-4678-ab64-f05a871032b7" />
  <img width="479" height="378" alt="Screenshot 2025-11-05 at 21 09 26" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b124b15f-f0f3-4dc7-a327-3861dd6ac5ab" />

  ## Breaking Changes
  None

  ## Checklist:
    _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._
  - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests
  - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_

ACKs for top commit:
  UdjinM6:
    ACK 9531028

Tree-SHA512: eb618eb68bc055a0fd0e434f7039efe75c420ffd01422211acde21e622d5ce0243a7a9d96e9bd654c7015f18b1beff044526cbe804f01dee9c961a7a0ebe1204
@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta added this to the 23 milestone Nov 7, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 7, 2025

✅ No Merge Conflicts Detected

This PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs.

Copy link

@UdjinM6 UdjinM6 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

utACK 6fd7059

@PastaPastaPasta PastaPastaPasta merged commit b380d48 into dashpay:v23.0.x Nov 8, 2025
28 of 31 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants