-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
fix: resolve compile error due to change in function arguments #6760
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
WalkthroughThe test case 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)src/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}Instructions used from: Sources:
src/{test,wallet/test,qt/test}/**/*.{cpp,h,cc,cxx,hpp}Instructions used from: Sources:
🧠 Learnings (2)📓 Common learningssrc/wallet/test/coinselector_tests.cpp (3)⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
knst
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK ead7dd0
UdjinM6
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch! 👍
utACK ead7dd0
Additional Information
dash#6570 and dash#6755 were merged into
developin that order, neither conflicting with the other. Unfortunately, as dash#6570 updated the arguments list forSetupDescriptorScriptPubKeyMans(), dash#6755 introduced new usage based on the older argument list and as it was new code, it was not registered as a conflict but has causeddevelopto fail (build).This pull request remedies that issue.
Breaking Changes
None expected.
Checklist