chore: Bump copyright #6546
Merged
chore: Bump copyright #6546
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
dropped for simplified merge message |
UdjinM6
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2025
kwvg
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2025
knst
added a commit
to knst/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2025
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 27, 2025
…nd debian's package c0d3abb fix: follow-up #6546 to bump copyright year in COPYING and debian's package (Konstantin Akimov) Pull request description: ## What was done? Bump copyright for 2025 for leftover files ## How Has This Been Tested? N/A ## Breaking Changes N/A ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK c0d3abb PastaPastaPasta: utACK c0d3abb Tree-SHA512: 7d9e915b4a05966c72b080a388676da1b112ad9c91b17e945a4834551e71ff0b76921a20cb1c1832677d1896123e6952352d0df5865cd091d6a0afd178e6e1a3
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
to PastaPastaPasta/dash
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2025
…r in COPYING and debian's package c0d3abb fix: follow-up dashpay#6546 to bump copyright year in COPYING and debian's package (Konstantin Akimov) Pull request description: ## What was done? Bump copyright for 2025 for leftover files ## How Has This Been Tested? N/A ## Breaking Changes N/A ## Checklist: - [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK c0d3abb PastaPastaPasta: utACK c0d3abb Tree-SHA512: 7d9e915b4a05966c72b080a388676da1b112ad9c91b17e945a4834551e71ff0b76921a20cb1c1832677d1896123e6952352d0df5865cd091d6a0afd178e6e1a3
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2025
8b4ab03 fix: suppress MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION bump in 6608 (pasta) aca04d1 chore: bump build to 22.1.2 (pasta) d9d8c24 docs: add release notes for 22.1.2 (pasta) fb45240 Merge #6608: fix: `cycleHash` should represent a cycle starting block of the signing quorum (pasta) 9d1498c Merge #6625: fix: adjust quorum rotation data results in some edge cases, add tests (pasta) dfc1119 Merge #6622: fix: efficient build mnlistdiffs in rotation info (pasta) 6fd626b Merge #6586: fix: revert deployment images back to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (`jammy`), pin QEMU to avoid segfault (pasta) affa9d1 Merge #6599: fix: follow-up #6546 to bump copyright year in COPYING and debian's package (pasta) f6163a2 Merge #6593: fix: resolve potential deadlock in coinjoin_tests (pasta) 243e0ab Merge #6585: fix: Do not assert special tx type for cbtx in simplified mn list diff output (pasta) 497f95c Merge #6581: perf: speedup of CBLSLazyPublicKey::operator== when comparing to the default / null object; speedup CDeterministicMNList::AddMN by avoiding check to IsValid when a nullcheck is sufficient (pasta) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented Backports for a new version, v22.1.2 ## What was done? See release notes ## How Has This Been Tested? ## Breaking Changes None ## Checklist: _Go over all the following points, and put an `x` in all the boxes that apply._ - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [x] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: UdjinM6: utACK 8b4ab03 knst: utACK 8b4ab03 Tree-SHA512: 9f2f65e315940197cc2b75a6b0a858d624256cbe668272ff6dfa216eceda1ba9338484d47afc569202b3b5cc75b4dcb825209efe3a3d3ccec57c741f75c40577
PastaPastaPasta
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2025
8b4ab03 fix: suppress MIN_MASTERNODE_PROTO_VERSION bump in 6608 (pasta) aca04d1 chore: bump build to 22.1.2 (pasta) d9d8c24 docs: add release notes for 22.1.2 (pasta) fb45240 Merge #6608: fix: `cycleHash` should represent a cycle starting block of the signing quorum (pasta) 9d1498c Merge #6625: fix: adjust quorum rotation data results in some edge cases, add tests (pasta) dfc1119 Merge #6622: fix: efficient build mnlistdiffs in rotation info (pasta) 6fd626b Merge #6586: fix: revert deployment images back to Ubuntu 22.04 LTS (`jammy`), pin QEMU to avoid segfault (pasta) affa9d1 Merge #6599: fix: follow-up #6546 to bump copyright year in COPYING and debian's package (pasta) f6163a2 Merge #6593: fix: resolve potential deadlock in coinjoin_tests (pasta) 243e0ab Merge #6585: fix: Do not assert special tx type for cbtx in simplified mn list diff output (pasta) 497f95c Merge #6581: perf: speedup of CBLSLazyPublicKey::operator== when comparing to the default / null object; speedup CDeterministicMNList::AddMN by avoiding check to IsValid when a nullcheck is sufficient (pasta) 4298d73 chore: bump to 22.1.1 (pasta) fc65a16 chore: release notes for 22.1.1 (pasta) 38762f7 Merge #6574: fix: ReconnectionInfo should also store Dash-specific flags (pasta) 580b74c Merge #6566: fix(qt): avoid leaking balance and CJ info in GUI when in discreet mode (pasta) Pull request description: ## Issue being fixed or feature implemented ## What was done? ff-ed `master` 21.1.0 -> 21.1.2, merging it back into `develop` now ## How Has This Been Tested? ## Breaking Changes ## Checklist: - [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code - [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas - [ ] I have added or updated relevant unit/integration/functional/e2e tests - [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation - [ ] I have assigned this pull request to a milestone _(for repository code-owners and collaborators only)_ ACKs for top commit: PastaPastaPasta: utACK 73fa780; gonna merge as this changes docs only Tree-SHA512: f04fe461edc05c38771d684bd5d60327076251b8004723027276b104989ea6d84f7f77cce31f310f058e81f2c25411ab5a15b563cd3db66091ccaf33da459e3c
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
Bump copyright for 2025
To be merged into develop first, then backported (or maybe ff-ed) to v22.1 branch
What was done?
How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
Checklist: