You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have got a setup where five pysical CAN devices get recorded. When looking at the corresponding .mf4 file utilizing asammdf.MDF(fp).channels_db channel group indices well and beyond zero to five are displayed. Neither the master_db nor the bus_logging_map attribute seem to give me the channel group to physical CAN device mapping.
Did I just miss something or how to I get this mapping?
Any hint is much appreciated.
Cheers!
Edit: I found a solution via the detour of utilizing the CAN devices' names as stated during the recording.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Hello,
I have got a setup where five pysical CAN devices get recorded. When looking at the corresponding .mf4 file utilizing
asammdf.MDF(fp).channels_db
channel group indices well and beyond zero to five are displayed. Neither themaster_db
nor thebus_logging_map
attribute seem to give me the channel group to physical CAN device mapping.Did I just miss something or how to I get this mapping?
Any hint is much appreciated.
Cheers!
Edit: I found a solution via the detour of utilizing the CAN devices' names as stated during the recording.
However, this only works if the CAN devices' names that got used during recording are known. How can this mapping be done without knowing the names?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions