Skip to content

Create a jupyter-slides (name to be discussed ;-) organization to house several Jupyter slideshows projects #635

Open
@damianavila

Description

@bollwyvl captured quite well the story around presenting with Jupyter at https://github.com/deathbeds/jupyterlab-deck/blob/main/examples/History.ipynb.

Currently, we have RISE (supporting the v6 notebook), the JLab-compatible incantation that was pushed forward by @fcollonval as a PR on this very same repo (#605) but eventually landed in https://github.com/jupyterlab-contrib/rise, and a new attempt to solve the problem called jupyterlab-deck living at https://github.com/deathbeds/jupyterlab-deck.

I think we can all benefit if we join forces with a GH organization that can sustain independent but super-related projects like the ones I mentioned above. For instance, the JLab-compatible rise implementation now lives in a different repo (for simplicity at the time to generate a package) but it obviously shares a lot of stuff with the original v6-compatible RISE. The jupyterlab-deck project is using the already established nbconvert/RISE metadata, so any changes in that aspect of RISE going forward can be (previously to be implemented) discussed and agreed on so jupyterlab-deck keeps compatibility on that aspect (or maybe influence RISE somehow in the other direction!!).

I also see how other implementations of the "Jupyter slides" (presenting with Jupyter) can converge on this yet-to-be-created new organization, giving people enough freedom to keep exploring the space on their own independent repo but benefiting, at the same time, of having a shared space where we can all discuss ideas relevant to this topic.

@bollwyvl, @fcollonval, @parmentelat, WDYT?

In summary, the proposal follows:

  1. Create a new GH organization (Jupyter Slides... suggestions for other names are welcome 😉).
  2. Move repos into the new org:
  1. Set up permissions properly so everyone has the flexibility they want on those repos.
  2. Tell people about this!!
  3. Do more fun stuff!!

Btw, I will be more than happy to push forward on the steps I am proposing above if we get a general agreement.

Thoughts are welcome!!

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions