Skip to content

Conversation

@appleboy
Copy link
Contributor

  • Remove unnecessary blank lines from test functions for improved code clarity

- Remove unnecessary blank lines from test functions for improved code clarity

Signed-off-by: appleboy <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
Copy link
Owner

@cweill cweill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.07%. Comparing base (5e8b5b0) to head (0439fbe).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop     #198   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    93.07%   93.07%           
========================================
  Files           14       14           
  Lines         1271     1271           
========================================
  Hits          1183     1183           
  Misses          49       49           
  Partials        39       39           
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e-tests 90.58% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5e8b5b0...0439fbe. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

coverage: 94.232%. remained the same
when pulling 0439fbe on appleboy:ai
into 5e8b5b0 on cweill:develop.

@cweill cweill merged commit 2a672c5 into cweill:develop Oct 24, 2025
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants