netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule removal from chain binding

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-1720
JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-1721
Upstream Status: commit f15f29f

Conflicts: cs9 lacks commit
7d937b1 ("netfilter: nf_tables: support for deleting devices in an existing netdev chain"),
adjust context.

commit f15f29f
Author: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Date:   Thu Sep 7 08:22:33 2023 +0200

    netfilter: nf_tables: disallow rule removal from chain binding

    Chain binding only requires the rule addition/insertion command within
    the same transaction. Removal of rules from chain bindings within the
    same transaction makes no sense, userspace does not utilize this
    feature. Replace nft_chain_is_bound() check to nft_chain_binding() in
    rule deletion commands. Replace command implies a rule deletion, reject
    this command too.

    Rule flush command can also safely rely on this nft_chain_binding()
    check because unbound chains are not allowed since 62e1e94
    ("netfilter: nf_tables: reject unbound chain set before commit phase").

    Fixes: d0e2c7d ("netfilter: nf_tables: add NFT_CHAIN_BINDING")
    Reported-by: Kevin Rich <kevinrich1337@gmail.com>
    Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>

Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fwestpha@redhat.com>

Author: fw-strlen

net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c

@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
 		if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain))
 			continue;
 
-		if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+		if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
 			continue;
 
 		ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ static int nft_flush_table(struct nft_ctx *ctx)
 		if (!nft_is_active_next(ctx->net, chain))
 			continue;
 
-		if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+		if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
 			continue;
 
 		ctx->chain = chain;
@@ -2706,6 +2706,9 @@ static int nf_tables_delchain(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
 		return PTR_ERR(chain);
 	}
 
+	if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	if (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_NONREC &&
 	    chain->use > 0)
 		return -EBUSY;
@@ -3696,6 +3699,11 @@ static int nf_tables_newrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
 	}
 
 	if (info->nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_REPLACE) {
+		if (nft_chain_binding(chain)) {
+			err = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+			goto err_destroy_flow_rule;
+		}
+
 		err = nft_delrule(&ctx, old_rule);
 		if (err < 0)
 			goto err_destroy_flow_rule;
@@ -3803,7 +3811,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
 			NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(extack, nla[NFTA_RULE_CHAIN]);
 			return PTR_ERR(chain);
 		}
-		if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+		if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
 			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 	}
 
@@ -3837,7 +3845,7 @@ static int nf_tables_delrule(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
 		list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
 			if (!nft_is_active_next(net, chain))
 				continue;
-			if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+			if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
 				continue;
 
 			ctx.chain = chain;
@@ -10640,7 +10648,7 @@ static void __nft_release_table(struct net *net, struct nft_table *table)
 	ctx.family = table->family;
 	ctx.table = table;
 	list_for_each_entry(chain, &table->chains, list) {
-		if (nft_chain_is_bound(chain))
+		if (nft_chain_binding(chain))
 			continue;
 
 		ctx.chain = chain;