Chore: Format and lint code using Ruff #156
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
amotl
force-pushed
the
amo/support-table-quoting
branch
2 times, most recently
from
fab6f4b
to
a80fb4d
Compare
|
Can I please ask you to remove the |
amotl
commented
Aug 28, 2024
Comment on lines
-275
to
+283
| { cmd = "mypy" }, | ||
| # { cmd = "mypy" }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adjusting the code base for proper type-hinting did not happen within this patch, because I did not want to mix up concerns too much, by adding those changes within the noise of code-formatting only.
It will be tackled on a subsequent iteration.
surister
approved these changes
Aug 28, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
About
Not invoked yet when conceiving this project, this patch adjusts code formatting, by using the Ruff code formatter. No significant semantic changes have been applied.