Skip to content

CXXCBC-194 Support ExtThreadSafe transaction extension. #374

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 28, 2023

Conversation

davidkelly
Copy link
Contributor

While at it, updated the public version of transaction_get_result to not strip out the metadata and links, as they are needed when staging replace/remove operations.

Also, the fit tests would sometimes run into issues with the naive retry
strategy when there was a FAIL_AMBIGUOUS while setting the ATR. Redid
the transaction_context's utility for delaying to no longer be
recursive, avoiding the issue. There are other places where this
strategy should be used in the future, in the utilities that do the
various forms of delay and exponential backoff, which I'll create a
ticket to improve later.

While at it, updated the public version of transaction_get_result to not
strip out the metadata and links, as they are needed when staging
replace/remove operations.

Also, the fit tests would sometimes run into issues with the naive retry
strategy when there was a FAIL_AMBIGUOUS while setting the ATR.   Redid
the transaction_context's utility for delaying to no longer be
recursive, avoiding the issue.   There are other places where this
strategy should be used in the future, in the utilities that do the
various forms of delay and exponential backoff, which I'll create a
ticket to improve later.
@davidkelly davidkelly marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2023 18:06
@davidkelly davidkelly requested a review from avsej February 28, 2023 18:06
@davidkelly davidkelly merged commit dfc5579 into main Feb 28, 2023
@davidkelly davidkelly deleted the dk/cxxcbc-194_2 branch February 28, 2023 20:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants