Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: remove sdk dep from store #14603

Merged
merged 15 commits into from
Jan 13, 2023
Merged

refactor: remove sdk dep from store #14603

merged 15 commits into from
Jan 13, 2023

Conversation

tac0turtle
Copy link
Member

Description

Closes: #XXXX


Author Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow up issues.

I have...

  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • added ! to the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • targeted the correct branch (see PR Targeting)
  • provided a link to the relevant issue or specification
  • followed the guidelines for building modules
  • included the necessary unit and integration tests
  • added a changelog entry to CHANGELOG.md
  • included comments for documenting Go code
  • updated the relevant documentation or specification
  • reviewed "Files changed" and left comments if necessary
  • confirmed all CI checks have passed

Reviewers Checklist

All items are required. Please add a note if the item is not applicable and please add
your handle next to the items reviewed if you only reviewed selected items.

I have...

  • confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • confirmed ! in the type prefix if API or client breaking change
  • confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed
  • reviewed state machine logic
  • reviewed API design and naming
  • reviewed documentation is accurate
  • reviewed tests and test coverage
  • manually tested (if applicable)

@tac0turtle tac0turtle requested a review from a team as a code owner January 12, 2023 16:32
@tac0turtle tac0turtle changed the title refactor: remove sdk dip from store refactor: remove sdk dep from store Jan 12, 2023
@@ -22,7 +21,7 @@ type AppModuleSimulation interface {
ProposalContents(simState SimulationState) []simulation.WeightedProposalContent

// register a func to decode the each module's defined types from their corresponding store key
RegisterStoreDecoder(storetypes.StoreDecoderRegistry)
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this is interface breaking but I think its acceptable since other wise store has a simulation type for no reason

Copy link
Member

@julienrbrt julienrbrt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm, nit golangci-lint errors about duplicate package import and the other undefined errors.

Copy link
Contributor

@likhita-809 likhita-809 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need to address julien's comment, otherwise lgtm

testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
testutil/sims/simulation_helpers.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tac0turtle and others added 2 commits January 13, 2023 14:21
Co-authored-by: Likhita Polavarapu <78951027+likhita-809@users.noreply.github.com>
@tac0turtle tac0turtle enabled auto-merge (squash) January 13, 2023 15:45
@julienrbrt
Copy link
Member

Same as 14a1f81 needs to be done for ./tests

@tac0turtle tac0turtle merged commit a2eb630 into main Jan 13, 2023
@tac0turtle tac0turtle deleted the marko/store_gomod branch January 13, 2023 17:43
larry0x pushed a commit to larry0x/cosmos-sdk that referenced this pull request May 22, 2023
Co-authored-by: Likhita Polavarapu <78951027+likhita-809@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants